When we analyse statistics properly, we begin to see the bigger picture. The same principle applies when examining domestic abuse.
Since 2012, physical stalking has increased by 15 percent. In contrast, cyberstalking has risen by 70 percent. Studies show that women, young people and members of the LGBTQ+ community are significantly more likely to report being cyberstalked than other groups.
These figures draw attention to the role of social media platforms in modern patterns of abuse. One platform that warrants particular discussion is Snapchat.
Many parents and young adults are familiar with Snapchat and the mixed perceptions surrounding it. For some, it is seen as harmless and playful. Users can send photos with filters, build daily “streaks” by messaging friends consistently, and see rankings based on who they interact with most.
However, there is a more concerning side. This is not solely about the design of the app, but about how its features can be exploited.
Snapchat is widely used for socialising, dating and intimate communication. Unfortunately, this can intersect with exploitation and sexual offending. Reported on 01 November 2024, Imran Rahman-Jones Technology reporter had said ‘More than 7,000 Sexual Communication with a Child offences were recorded across the UK in the year to March 2024 – the highest number since the offence was created. Snapchat made up nearly half of the 1,824 cases where the specific platform used for the grooming was recorded by the police.’
Snapchat’s popularity among young people has therefore raised serious safeguarding concerns. Beyond criminal exploitation, there are also wider issues relating to coercive control and mental wellbeing.
Snap Maps v Coercive Control
Evidential Challenges in Legal Proceedings
From a legal perspective, Snapchat presents practical difficulties.
Messages and images are designed to disappear. Although chats can be saved, users are notified if a screenshot is taken. For individuals experiencing abuse, this notification can create fear of escalation.
As a result, an applicant seeking protective measures may struggle to provide evidence of conversations that demonstrate threats, harassment or coercive control. This evidential barrier can deter young people from taking action.
For solicitors, it is increasingly important to ask clear questions about digital communication, location sharing and platform use when assessing risk.
Technology is not inherently harmful. However, features that allow constant access, monitoring and disappearing communication can be misused.
For young people, it is important to recognise that streaks, rankings and location sharing do not equate to safety or trust. Boundaries are not suspicious. Privacy is not disloyalty.
For legal professionals, understanding how social media platforms operate is now essential when advising clients and assessing safeguarding concerns.
Domestic abuse is evolving. Our awareness and response must evolve with it.
